Browse by subject:
Applied and bridge studies study record
Decision Accounting & recordsThe Decision Record as Privacy Infrastructure: Why Recording Who-Decided-What-and-Why Protects Rather Than Endangers Individual Privacy
STATUS · Manuscript in progressSSRN · Not yet posted
MECHANISM
Identify the incentive structure and the condition that would falsify the claim.
RULE CHANGE
Read the intervention only after the paper shows how the current payoff space fails to support system welfare.
READER USE
Use the summary to see where private gain creates system exposure, then check the study record.
Contribution — what this adds to the conversation
The privacy objection to DA misidentifies the relevant counterfactual: the status quo already contains ungoverned dossiers. DA records replace ungoverned records with governed ones, including access controls, purpose limitations, and individual rights. Architectural safeguards (role-based access, purpose limitation, data minimization, retention scheduling, audit) mitigate surveillance risk. Legal safeguards (data subject rights, independent oversight, legal privilege, cross-border restrictions) reinforce architectural protections.
WHAT'S NEW · The privacy objection to DA misidentifies the relevant counterfactual: the status quo already contains ungoverned dossiers. DA records replace ungoverned records with governed ones, including access controls, purpose limitations, and individual rights. Architectural safeguards (role-based access, purpose limitation, data minimization, retention scheduling, audit) mitigate surveillance risk. Legal safeguards (data subject rights, independent oversight, legal privilege, cross-border restrictions) reinforce architectural protections.
The paper defends the Decision Accountability (DA) framework against the objection that mandatory recording of organizational decisions creates a privacy-threatening dossier infrastructure. It argues that the current regime already contains ungoverned dossiers assembled by data brokers, and that the DA framework replaces these with governed records that include access controls, purpose limitations, and individual rights. The paper formalizes the objection as an equilibrium selection problem, specifies architectural and legal safeguards, and states a falsification condition for the objection to be sustained.