Questions, errata, bibliography corrections, and research roadmap.
Public research should be easy to challenge. Use your own email client to send questions, corrections, missing sources, bibliography fixes, and suggestions for what should be replicated or documented next, so you keep your own record of what you sent.
Where to send it
Email erik@woosterllc.com. The links on this page open a normal email draft; the site does not collect or submit comments.
For corrections, include the page URL, the exact sentence or table row, the proposed correction, and the source that supports it. For bibliography issues, include DOI, SSRN, publisher page, Crossref record, or the best available citation.
Correction and review channels
How corrections will be handled
Open research-record priorities
| Priority | Public record standard |
|---|---|
| Bibliographies | Clean paper-level bibliographies across the public and study corpora; mark uncertain references rather than treating them as verified. |
| Replication packages | Expose data, code, and method notes for domain estimates as they become reproducible. |
| Errata log | Record material corrections with date, affected page, correction, and reason. |
| Source challenges | Track open challenges to βW, Π, ΔW, theorem scope, and publication status until resolved. |
| Peer review | Separate working-paper claims from peer-reviewed, independently replicated, or institutionally adopted results. |
What feedback can and cannot establish
A correction email can improve a study record, bibliography entry, theorem boundary, or public explanation. It does not by itself establish peer review, replication, legal advice, institutional adoption, or final truth. Those statuses are stated separately on the publication index, study records, theorem table, and methodology pages.