Applying the System Asset Pricing Model
Decision Accounting

Applying the System Asset Pricing Model to Orbital Access: Measuring the System Welfare Cost of Low Earth Orbit Congestion

core-claim
Core claim

Each dollar of orbital-access revenue destroys $2.18 in welfare

The global satellite industry generates 293 billion per year in revenue, but imposes 638 billion per year in welfare costs across seven channels. The system beta βW = 2.18.

problem
The problem

LEO is a common-pool resource with no sovereign pricing or property rights

Article II of the 1967 Outer Space Treaty bans national appropriation; Article I mandates free access. No state can tax or own orbital slots.

trap
Missing system trap

Every bilateral transaction is rational; the aggregate outcome destroys welfare

Each satellite launch is individually profitable, but adds to collision risk for all 13,026 active satellites. No single operator can improve system welfare by unilateral restraint.

channels
Seven channels

Welfare destruction is measured across seven monetized channels

The total welfare cost W = $638B/year, dominated by the intertemporal option value channel (foreclosed future orbital access).

ceiling
Orbital congestion ceiling

No market mechanism can push system beta below ~1.5

Under three axioms (Launch Necessity, Debris Generation Identity, Kessler Cascade Irreversibility), the N² scaling of collision probability guarantees that marginal welfare cost exceeds marginal private benefit at current densities.

pigou
Pigouvian insufficiency

Bilateral taxes computed from launch transactions cannot internalize aggregate density costs

The welfare cost is a property of the aggregate orbital density field, not of any individual launch. No bilateral tax can price the systemic risk.

classification
Equilibrium classification

Orbital access is a Slow Hollow Win

β̄ > 1 (2.18), multi-generational latency (debris at 800 km persists for centuries), and partially irreversible environmental stock effects (hypervelocity fragmentation is thermodynamically irreversible).

transformations
Game transformations

Early-stage interventions alter the system beta by shifting governance architecture

The FCC's 5-year deorbit rule, the proposed Orbital-Use Fee (Rao et al., 2020), and ESA's ClearSpace-1 mission are institutional interventions that move from open-access anarchy to priced commons.

evidence

Theoretical result stands independently of precise empirical calibration

The Orbital Congestion Ceiling is deductive from axioms A1–A3. The empirical βW = 2.18 is a first-pass estimate subject to parameter uncertainty, especially discount-rate sensitivity in the intertemporal channel.

implications
What it changes

The system beta makes the invisible welfare cost of orbital congestion measurable and actionable

Standard space-economics metrics (revenue, launch cost, market cap) miss the $638B/year welfare destruction. The SAPM provides a single dimensionless ratio that can track progress toward sustainability.