Apply system-welfare measurement to a real decision.
The Center for Decision Accounting conducts new SAPM studies, reviews independent calculations, and helps organizations place system-welfare evidence inside the decisions that create or reduce the harm.
A rapid, source-linked assessment of whether an existing domain estimate fits the proposed decision and which evidence gaps matter most.
Boundary-match report
Material harm channels
Evidence gaps
Recommended study route
Decision-grade calibration
A decision-specific estimate with matched activity and revenue boundaries, uncertainty analysis, overlap review, and a complete evidence card.
Channel ledger
Monte Carlo model
Sensitivity analysis
Reviewable final report
New-domain SAPM study
An original measurement program for an activity outside the current registry, including evidence acquisition, model construction, and review gates.
Research protocol
Evidence receipts
Versioned estimate
Registry-ready record
Independent calculation review
A reconstruction of an internal or third-party estimate from its evidence, assumptions, code, and outputs, with disagreements recorded explicitly.
Source verification
Boundary and denominator review
Independent rerun
Signed review statement
Software and GDSS integration
Implementation of the SAPM evidence object and Decision Accounting fields inside negotiation, strategy, risk, governance, or agent software.
Data contract
Workflow design
Review controls
Acceptance tests
Regulatory and public decision analysis
A documented welfare calculation prepared for a board, regulator, policymaker, auditor, insurer, or other consequential reader.
Audience-specific report
Source appendix
Alternative assumptions
Reconsideration conditions
Litigation research and consulting
Independent economic analysis for counsel and multidisciplinary expert teams, beginning with consulting work and case-specific review before any testifying role.
Case assessment
Litigation-grade SAPM study
Reproducible model and source record
Expert-team support
Research standards
Applied work uses the same method as the public research.
An organization may define the question, supply data, and require lawful confidentiality. The Center remains responsible for the research method, analysis, conclusions, statements of uncertainty, and correction of errors.
Public research
The method, paper replication materials, published-domain evidence needed to evaluate claims, corrections, and falsification conditions remain publicly inspectable.
Applied research
Decision-specific and confidential work uses explicit sources, boundary choices, assumptions, uncertainty, and review records.
Academic publication
The author controls academic methods, conclusions, corrections, and submission. Direct support and relevant relationships are disclosed when required by the receiving journal.
Engagement path
From question to reviewable result.
A short scoping discussion determines the decision, audience, available evidence, time horizon, and appropriate evidence status. The resulting proposal states the outputs, review gates, timetable, compensation, ownership, methodological control, confidentiality, and publication terms before work begins.