Browse by subject:
Paper #1013
Decision Accounting and the Recognition Problem: Answering the OECD Objection
The paper proves the Recognition Theorem: international corporate governance principles do not make corporate decisions reconstructable. The OECD objection—that Decision Accounting is unnecessary because governance principles already exist—confuses framework-level expectations with decision-record standards. The paper introduces the βW metric to measure the recognition gap and shows that existing frameworks cover zero of the seventeen DA fields. Case studies of Volkswagen and Boeing 737 MAX illustrate the Hollow Win / management failure equilibrium where principles create legitimacy without accountability.
Reading welfare beta
Welfare beta, written as βW and pronounced beta W, means annual system-welfare loss divided by annual industry revenue, written as Π and pronounced capital pi. Revenue is the denominator, never profit; ΔW and Π must use the same domain, same time period, and same activity boundary. See the welfare-beta methodology manual.
OPEN HTML DECK ↗Deck mode is an on-site reading view, not a PowerPoint download.
Theorem status: evidence-traced claim under the cited paper's assumptionsFalsification: show the same game preserving system welfare without changing the payoff structure
KEY FINDINGS
THEOREM
Recognition Theorem: Governance principles do not become decision reconstruction standards by being internationally recognized. A governance regime that lacks a complete decision record can satisfy the OECD Principles and still fail decision-level accountability.
PLAIN ENGLISH
Just because a country follows international corporate governance principles doesn't mean its companies' decisions can be reconstructed after the fact. Decision Accounting fills that gap.
EVIDENCE & LIMITATIONS
- Theorem status: evidence-traced claim under the cited paper's assumptions
- Falsification: show the same game preserving system welfare without changing the payoff structure
REFERENCES / CITATION STATUS
References section
Detected
Bibliography entries
362
In-text citations
0
Unique citations
259
Footnote markers
179
Citation year span
1521-2024
Source hash
2b6e25fa2ca7
This page reports reference counts measured directly from the manuscript. Full reference entries render only when a curated source chapter carries a public References, Bibliography, Source Notes, Supplemental Reference Archive, Footnotes, or Source-Grounding Ledger section. The site does not synthesize citation entries. Literature-claim verification status: not evaluated.
Loading curated reference section…
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The OECD objection is the most common challenge to Decision Accounting: corporate governance principles already exist, so DA is redundant or infeasible. The paper proves that objection rests on a category error. Governance principles are framework-level normative instructions; decision reconstruction standards are record-level specifications. The Recognition Theorem states that principles do not become reconstruction standards by being internationally recognized. The paper defines the βW metric to quantify the recognition gap: for the OECD Principles, βW = pending reconciliation (complete gap). Case studies of Volkswagen and Boeing 737 MAX show that even under strong governance frameworks, decisions can remain unreconstructable. The paper concludes that DA recognition should proceed through regulatory convergence and sectoral mandates, not prior OECD endorsement.
METHODOLOGY
The paper uses formal theorem proof with axioms and propositions, field-coverage analysis of international governance frameworks, and case study illustrations. The βW metric quantifies the recognition gap.
SOURCE QUESTIONS
SSRN not yet postedDeck ↗
WHY THIS MATTERS
For the economist
A structural claim about when bilateral optimization degrades the shared system. Read the formal statement and its stated axioms.
For the regulator
The constraint is physical or biological, so disclosure alone will not internalize it. The policy lever is to bound exposure, not to price it away.
For the executive
This is where a privately efficient decision can degrade the system the business depends on. The governance question is which decision records would make that system cost visible before it is normalized.
For the teacher
An on-site HTML deck and the expanded curriculum cover the argument, the evidence, and the measurement. Use the deck as a self-contained class session, then route deeper through the 45-50h core course or 100+h full curriculum.
For the affected community
In plain terms: who gains from the current arrangement, who pays for it, and what rule change would alter that split. The summary states each without jargon.
© 2026 Erik Postnieks · Independent Researcher · Salt Lake City